Based on the search results, here’s a detailed analysis of *Janam Sakshi’s election survey accuracy reports*, focusing on the 2018 and 2023 Telangana Legislative Assembly elections:

### *2018 Telangana Election Predictions*
1. *TRS Seat Prediction*:
– Claim: Janam Sakshi reportedly predicted the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS, now BRS) would win *88 seats*.
– Actual Outcome: TRS secured *88 out of 119 seats*, matching the prediction. However, no direct primary source (e.g., archived e-paper or broadcast) confirms Janam Sakshi made this exact forecast .

2. *Candidate Loss Predictions*:
– Janam Sakshi allegedly declared losses for several prominent candidates, including:
– *Revanth Reddy* (Kodangal): Lost to TRS’s Patnam Narender Reddy.
– *K. Jana Reddy* (Nagarjuna Sagar): Lost to TRS’s Nomula Narsimhaiah.
– *G. Chinna Reddy* (Wanaparthy): Lost to TRS’s Singireddy Niranjan Reddy.
– *DK Aruna* (Gadwal): Lost to TRS’s Bandla Krishna Mohan Reddy.
– *Chada Venkat Reddy (CPI chief)*: Lost in Huzurnagar.
– Inaccuracy: *Komati Reddy Venkat Reddy* (Nalgonda) was predicted to lose but won, defeating Congress’s Bhupal Reddy .

### *2023 Telangana Election Predictions*
1. *Congress Seat Range*:
– Claim: Janam Sakshi projected Congress would win *64–70 seats*.
– Actual Outcome: Congress won *65 seats, falling within the predicted range. This aligns with other surveys like *The Hindu’s forecast of 58–67 seats .

2. *KCR’s Kamareddy Loss*:
– Predicted that sitting CM *K. Chandrashekar Rao (KCR)* would lose the Kamareddy seat.
– Verification: KCR lost to BJP’s Katipally Venkata Ramana Reddy, confirming the prediction .

### *Credibility and Neutrality*
– Janam Sakshi is recognized by the Telangana government and the Indian Newspaper Society, suggesting institutional credibility .
– While its predictions were largely accurate, the lack of archived primary sources (e.g., e-paper links or video transcripts) limits independent verification. Neutrality claims remain plausible but unconfirmed .

### *Conclusion*
Janam Sakshi’s surveys demonstrated *high accuracy* in both elections, particularly for seat totals and key candidate outcomes. However, the absence of direct sources necessitates cautious interpretation. For full verification, accessing Janam Sakshi’s e-paper archives or related broadcasts (e.g., Sakshi TV) is recommended .